Wednesday, Sep 09th

One Year Later: Why Scarsdale Residents Were Right to Question Flock

SurveillanceState(This is the opinion of Scarsdale10583 site founder Joanne Wallenstein)

It’s been a little over a year since the Mayor of Scarsdale announced that a highly controversial contract with Flock Safety had been postponed.

The seven-year, $1.8 million contract included the purchase and installation of license plate readers, cameras and a drone. The contract was approved by the Village Board in April 2025, when a last minute resolution was added to the meeting agenda before the meeting, without any public review.

After a public outcry, and a petition signed by over 400 residents, the contract was put on hold.

In the intervening year, Flock Safety has continued to expand, and so has the movement against it.

On August 10, the New York Times reported, “Flock’s 120,000 cameras can be found alongside roads in every state but Alaska, allowing law enforcement officers to see within seconds where a car might be, and where it has been. The company has contracts with 7,000 law enforcement agencies, which is 40 percent of all departments in the United States.”

At the same time, a movement to block the cameras has also gone national. Why? People fear that police can use the data to track their movements without a search warrant and use the data collected by the cameras to arrest immigrants, track women crossing state lines for an abortion and collect information about our movements without a court order. They say that the web of interstate data held by Flock Safety violates individuals’ civil liberties.

Even conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has spoken out about the surveillance, saying, “he had only recently become aware of the scale of Flock’s network after visiting (the app) DeFlock, which had left him “horrified.” He said he was surprised such an expansive surveillance system had grown with so little public attention.”

He was referring to an app called DeFlock created in 2024 to allow users to track and report the location of Flock cameras. It has now been downloaded 350,000 times.

And people are doing more than reporting the locations of the cameras. In some cities, the cameras are being vandalized. All across the country there are reports of vandalism to the cameras, and the critics are non-partisan. In Texas, the cameras were opposed by both liberals and conservatives.

On August 12, 2026, the Suffolk Times reported that cameras in Southold and Peconic New York were splattered with paint and turned so that they could not track the traffic.

On August 6, police in Summit ,Colorado reported the 4 of the cities 30 Flock cameras have been disconnected from wires and turned away from traffic.

The Des Moines Register reports similar destruction in Iowa

And these are only a few of the scores of reports of vandalism to Flock cameras from Florida, to Rhode Island and Troy New York.

What can we learn from recent history?

The Flock resolution in Scarsdale caught many by surprise. Residents had not heard of the company and did not realize that the contract for “Police Technology” was actually a contract for “Police Surveillance.”

So the first lesson is to stay informed. Though it’s a daunting task these days, keep up on both local and national news and read the agendas for the Scarsdale Village and Scarsdale School Boards. You’ll find they contain lots of interesting facts. I’ve heard too many people tell me they are “taking a break” from the news, or that they feel that they have no impact. Don’t let yourself off the hook.

Second, it’s up to you to speak up to protect your rights. In Scarsdale, it’s safe to say that it was the outcry from residents that brought the Flock Safety proposal to a halt. Stay informed and use your voice to advocate for what you believe is right.

Last, if you witness a violation of civil rights, report it. Just last summer a Scarsdale resident was taken away by ICE when she went to Manhattan for a routine visa hearing. The efforts of her neighbors in Scarsdale were ultimately pivotal in securing her release from a detention facility in Louisiana.

A parting thought. Last week Congressman George Latimer visited a detention facility in Newark, NJ where 800 immigrants are being held. The detainees, many who have lived in the United States for years, worked and paid taxes, were rounded up by masked ICE agents. They now sit in limbo, separated from their homes and families.

Commenting on what he saw, Latimer offered a cautionary warning to us all. He said, “One day they decide that immigrants are the target – and they round them up without warning. But the next time the target could be you. You could say something that the authorities don’t like or simply be part of a targeted group.”

He urged everyone to stay informed and vigilant in an age where our civil rights are being challenged.

Comments

0
John Dough jr
2 weeks ago
who will read the license plate when your car is stolen?

https://abc7ny.com/post/2000%25-increase-in-vehicle-thefts-in-scarsdale-60%25-in-county/6405261/
Like Like Quote | Report comment
0
Beth Lambert
3 weeks ago
I am grateful to you Joanne for shining a light on the surveillance contract. Of course for everyone with expertise and insights that stood up, recognizing the danger to our Scarsdale tapestry. I am still scratching my head about why our hardworking, intelligent, and dedicated trustees moved this initiative forward in the manner it was done in the first place. I am also so disappointed that Latimer supported it. (Maybe I'm wrong on this?) I generally find him to be so smart. This was a large and dangerous mistake. Flock is not the only surveillance company. We need to protect our privacy whether or not we think we've done wrong. And no, it's not "well your phone tracks you anyway". It's not the same

Grateful to enjoy the safety of Scarsdale. Hope to maintain it.
Like Like like 4 Quote | Report comment
0
Robert Berg
3 weeks ago
Joanne, you were the sharp-eyed reporter who first brought the outrageous and indeed illegal no-bid contract between Flock and Scarsdale to public attention. That opened the eyes of Josh Frankel and the rest of us to this travesty. And that public pressure led Mayor Arest and the Village Board to cancel this bad deal. Thank you.
Like Like like 5 Quote | Report comment
0
Claudine
3 weeks ago
Waste of two million dollars!! I have a pothole you can fill!! Just paid $$$$$$ to get my tires realigned!!!
Like Like like 3 Quote | Report comment
0
Michael P. Collins
3 weeks ago
This overly invasive surveillance is an issue on which both Conservatives and Civil Libertarians should be able to unite as it is an unwarranted and unjustified invasion of privacy.
Like Like like 4 Quote | Report comment
0
Edith Lauten
3 weeks ago
Scarsdale has a small jewel of a park inside our village .
I love to sit on a bench under the trees , in the shade ,with a beautiful view.
But now that view is marred by the back of a giant billboard which announces that "we Love Scarsdale"! If you love Scarsdale, please move the sign anywhere else ,outside our park!
Thank You, Edith Lauten
Like Like like 3 Quote | Report comment
0
Mayra Kirkendall-Rodrigu
3 weeks ago
Arest and the vast majority of the Board of Trustees voted to impose Flock Safety on Scarsdale residents without taking public feedback from residents. Disgraceful and undemocratic.

Clearly, Scarsdale residents must always keep an eye on Village matters.

Thank you Joanne for alerting Scarsdale residents about this travesty.
Like Like like love 5 Quote | Report comment
0
Josh Frankel
3 weeks ago
Whether for the lack of grant funding or the intense public outcry, Scarsdale clearly made the right choice in scrapping its plans to install a mass surveillance system, and the current nationwide firestorm over Flock proves it. Thank you to Joanne for bringing the matter to light in the first place.
Like Like like love 5 Quote | Report comment
1
Myra Saul
3 weeks ago
Thank you Scarsdale10583 for first alerting many Scarsdale residents to this invasion of privacy. The NYCLU is suing Westchester County regarding its use of information it has obtained from Flock cameras. Mass surveillance is serious business and not a frivolous annoyance.
Like Like like 12 Quote | Report comment

Add comment

Submit