Sunday, Sep 29th

flisseredInfrastructure issues were top priorities at the Scarsdale Board of Trustees Meeting on September 27. Flooding, sewage overflows and crumbling roads are plaguing the Village, and with limited funds available Village Managers are spending what they can to address these issues.

Mayor Flisser reported that she attended a meeting with Barry Road residents accompanied by Village Managers and the Superintendant of Public Works Benny Salinitro to discuss what could be done about the stagnant Hutchinson River tributary at the end of Barry and Tunstall Roads where there is a recurrent sewer overflow. There appears to be a need for a stormwater management program in this area that is also affected by the City of New Rochelle and the Town of Eastchester.Residents shared photographs that showed the condition of the tributary and new construction nearby.

After discussion, the Village staff agreed to the following:

  • Contact New Rochelle to determine what they are doing to maintain the river and to find out if they can identity the source of the blockage. New Rochelle has taken recent action to clean up debris on their portion of the stream.
  • Set up an inspection of the river in cooperation with New Rochelle.
  • Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers to consider de-silting or other projects for the river.
  • Check into eligibility for County grant money to fund projects that will reduce flooding associated with the river.

Salinitro agreed that dry sweeping the road after a sewer overflow is only a partial clean-up solution. He will research methods to sanitize the road surface as necessary. A follow up meeting will be held around October 20th.

In the Public Comments section, the conversation turned to flooding of the Sheldrake River Basin around Cayuga Pond. Doug Ulene, Neil Tucker and Alissa Kanowitz urged the Village to act quickly to find a solution to the problems in that area. Kanowitz, who has experienced major flooding three times in the past month alone showed pictures of the overflowing pond, her submerged swimming pool and yard to the Trustees. She said, “The problem is getting worse. We cannot afford to wait for years. We need to fix this immediately. We have only been here for one year and we never would have come had we known this problem existed. “

In response Trustees passed a resolution appropriating up to $47,000 for a study of the Sheldrake River Basin that would identify the problems and offer solutions. The funds will allow engineers from Dvirka and Bartilucci to do a preliminary plan for a stormwater improvement project for the area. Once this is completed, Trustees will have what they need to evaluate the issue, analyze improvement plans and estimate the costs.

Roadwork: The Village also passed a resolution to appropriate an additional $400,000 for road repair, resurfacing and curbing. The original 2011 -12 budget only included $320,000 for road work, a steep reduction from the $990,000 spent in 2011-12. This new appropriation will bring funding for roadwork to $720,000.

Last, Trustees passed a resolution to allow the Scarsdale Youth Football league to use lights on the field three times per week from October 1 through November 12. The lights will give the league extended playing time and will be turned off by 7:30 pm.

Trustee Brodsky announced a Public Hearing on Tuesday October 25th at Village Hall to review amendments to the Village Code on affordable housing.

cnclogoaEach year, following the elections for the Citizens Nominating Committee and the general election for Scarsdale Mayor and Trustees, the Procedure Committee meets to consider any changes to the Non-Partisan Resolution that could improve the process. This year, the Procedure Committee has adopted a draft of proposed amendments to the Non-Partisan Resolution. After receiving public comment the Procedure Committee amendments will be finalized by October 7th and voted on in November.

This past year following the election for the nominators and the CNC’s deliberations to select Village Trustees and Mayor, questions emerged about the voting process for the nominators, the make-up of the committee, confidentiality and the voting process of the CNC. The Procedure Committee sought to address some of these concerns with their recommendation for amendments.

In addition, the Scarsdale Forum drafted their own Non-Partisan Procedure Report with their recommendations on some of these same issues in June. This report as well as the Procedure Committees recommended amendments will be considered at a Scarsdale Forum meeting on Thursday October 6th at 8 pm in the Scott Room of the Scarsdale Library. At that meeting, both the Procedure Committee and the Forum's Non-Partisan Procedure committee will present their proposals in a panel moderated by Forum member Seth Ross.

Here are the recommended changes from the Procedure Committee, and recommendations from the Forum Committee on those issues, if any:

Membership on the Procedure Committee:

Proposed Amendment: Prohibits any person who is a member of the Citizens Nominating Committee, the School Board Administrative Committee, the School Board Nominating Committee, the School Board, or the Village Board from simultaneously being a member of The Procedure Committee.

Forum Report: “ A sitting voting member of the CNC should not be an appointed member of The Procedure Committee.

Mail-in Ballots:

Proposed Amendment: To allow residents to vote by mail-in ballot, accompanied by certification of eligibility to vote, to be received by the Procedure Committee by the day before Election Day.

Forum Report: The current use of absentee ballots (with restriction on use) should be repositioned as mail-in ballots. The Committee agrees that these mail-in ballots should be made readily available throughout Scarsdale for those without ready access to the Internet. The Committee also recognizes that increasing voter participation through the use of mail-in ballots must be balanced against the importance of maintaining election integrity. The Committee recommends that guidelines for use of mail-in ballots forbid candidates to touch completed mail-in ballots. Mail-in ballots should be delivered and received prior to the close of the election.

Eligibility to Serve on the Citizens Nominating Committee:

Proposed Amendment:

a. Prohibiting anyone from running for election to the CNC if his or her election would or could cause more than one person from the same household to serve as a voting member of the CNC.

b. Prohibiting a former Mayor or Trustee of the Village from running for election to the CNC unless more than one election cycle (approximately 19 months) has passed since the person last served in such position.

c. Prohibiting any person from serving as a voting member of the CNC for more than three consecutive years, provided, that a person elected to fill a one-year vacancy in the CNC shall be able to run for and succeed himself or herself with a full three-year term.

d. Prohibiting any person from serving as a voting member of the CNC who is at the time of the election a member of The Procedure Committee, the School Board Nominating Committee, the School Board Administrative Committee, the School Board or the Village Board.

Forum Report: “The Committee believes that persons should not be disqualified for eligibility for the CNC for being related, by blood or marriage, to another CNC member, nor for being active, currently or formerly, in Village activities or for having taken a position on a Village issue.”

“The Committee recommends that a person who is elected to fill a two-year vacancy in the CNC should not be able to run and serve again, succeeding himself or herself with a full three-year term, but that a person who has been elected to fill a one-vacancy should be able to run or succeed himself or herself with a full three-year term.

Voting at CNC Meeting:

Proposed Amendment: To provide that no vote for any nominee for a particular office shall be taken at a meeting at which a Committee member has presented new information as to a nominee for such office based upon the Committee member’s personal experience.

Forum Report: If the CNC chair determines that a CNC member has raised allegations that require verification which cannot be accomplished during the normal course of the meeting, no further vote for any nominee should be taken at that meeting unless such determination of the chair is overruled by two-thirds of the voting members present.

Rules of Procedure:

Proposed Amendments to Article V, The Citizen’s Nominating Committee, Section 5, allowing The Procedure Committee to make recommendations to the CNC with respect to its Rules of Procedure, which shall be consistent with the purpose and provisions of the Non-Partisan Resolution, and providing that any questions of compliance with the provisions of the Resolution regarding Rules of Procedure shall be ruled on by the Chairperson, whose decision can only be overruled by a 2/3 vote of the voting members present.

Discussion:

The Procedure Committee recommendations address conflicts of interest, irregular voting practices, repeat membership on the committee as well as the timing of voting for Trustees, Mayor and Judges at the CNC proceedings. The Forum report is in agreement with the Procedure Committee on several issues and diverges on others.

Eligibility: Last year’s Citizen’s Nominating Committee included a married couple, a former Trustee, the wife of a sitting Trustee and five vocal members of the Heathcote Five Corners Coalition. By barring members of the same household from serving together and barring membership on the CNC to active members of a host of Village Committees, the amendment seeks to minimize conflicts of interest.

However, the Forum committee took issue with this suggestion, stating that the strength of the CNC is their members’ inside knowledge of the Village. In their words, “The strength of The Procedure Committee has been its ability to recruit individuals who are willing to participate in contested elections for the CNC. Certain members of the Committee who have recently served on the CNC noted that the make-up of the CNC seems to be more diverse than was historically the case, with members being a diverse mix of residents with varying involvement in Village activities. Those CNC members more active in Village activities are more likely to have first hand knowledge of Potential Nominees, and be less reliant on third party information.”

Mail-in Ballots: Both reports address irregularities in the voting process for the CNC, when candidates could personally deliver absentee ballots to the committee. This allowed candidates to obtain absentee ballots, ask friends and neighbors to complete them and then deliver them in one batch to the Procedure Committee to be tallied. The Procedure Committee seeks to prevent this in the future by requiring absentee ballots to be mailed in accompanied by a certificate of voter eligibility. The Forum Report also calls for “mail-in ballots” and forbids the candidates from touching the ballots.

Due Diligence: In response to claims that the CNC vote was swayed by last minute information about potential candidates, the Procedure Committee is recommending that voting be deferred if a “Committee member presents new information about a nominee.” This would presumably give the nominators time to evaluate the information and do their own due diligence before voting.

In the Forum report, in a section titled “Dealing with Surprises,” the Forum recognizes the potential for committee members to throw out new information or unsubstantiated claims that could affect the vote. However, they advocate adhering to the current rule. Here is their conclusion:

“If the CNC chair determines that a CNC member has raised allegations that require verification which cannot be accomplished during the normal course of the meeting, no further vote for any nominee should be taken at that meeting unless such determination of the chair is overruled by two-thirds of the voting members present.”

It is important to note that the Forum Report also addressed breaches in the confidentiality of the proceedings, and recommended that those who are found to have violated confidentiality could be sanctioned, publically censured and barred from further service fro three years.

The Forum Report states, “Any member of the Citizens Nominating Committee voting or non-voting, can report a breach of the CNC Confidentiality Policy to The Procedure Committee for review and possible sanctions. Such sanctions could include public censure, removal from the CNC and/or making such person ineligible to serve on the CNC and/or The Procedure Committee for not less than three (3) years from the expiration of such person’s term.”

The Procedure Committee does not address this issue, perhaps because the Forum’s recommendation would turn the Procedure Committee into a court for disputes and might also serve to discourage residents from running for the CNC. The Forum report also clarifies the role of the Scarsdale Forum in the proceedings. Since the President of the Forum chairs the Citizen’s Nominating Committee proceedings, some have charged that the Forum is has undue influence over the process.

Some believe that the Non-Partisan Process, in place in Scarsdale since 1930, serves the Village well as it eliminates partisan elections that can be divisive. However, critics argue that since the process is secretive and does not allow potential candidates to air their views on the issues it is undemocratic. After the election last March when two write-in candidates made substantial inroads at the polls, the Village was in an uproar about the process and the partisan nature of our “non-partisan” system, where a committee names nominees, rather than candidates seeking office.

The Procedure Committee recommendations as well as the Scarsdale Forum report seek to clarify the rules and restore confidence in the process. The full text of the Proposed Amendments is posted here and everyone is invited to a panel discussion about the process on Thursday, October 6 in the Scott Room of the Scarsdale Library at 8 p.m.

If you have comments on the amendments or the process, please post them below:

 

 

stormjohnson1On September 8th, the Municipal Service Committee of the Scarsdale Village Board received a final report from consultants Tetra Tech EM Inc. of Morris Plains N.J. who completed an All Hazards Mitigation Plan for Scarsdale Village that is now awaiting approval from FEMA. Funding for the plan was provided through a grant and the Village incurred no cost in drafting it.

The plan was created to allow the Village to be eligible for FEMA grant funding. Until a mitigation plan is in place, Scarsdale cannot apply for these funds. By producing this plan, the Village accomplished the following:

  • Developed a planning group (Planning Committee);
  • Identified hazards of concern;
  • Profiled and prioritized these hazards;
  • Estimated inventory at risk and potential losses associated with these hazards;
  • Developed mitigation goals, objectives and actions that address the hazards that impact the area;
  • Developed mitigation plan maintenance procedures to be executed upon conditional approval of the plan from the New York State Office of Emergency Management Office (NYSOEM) and FEMA.

The goal of the plan is to reduce losses from natural hazards, to make Scarsdale disaster resistant and to become eligible for federal funds for pre-disaster mitigation planning. In order to do so, the plan promotes appropriate village policy and practices to protect the residents, private property, public essential facilities and the environment from probable natural hazards.

Once the plan is adopted by FEMA, the Village would be eligible for funds to mitigate potential disasters rather than wait for the damage to occur and then apply for clean-up funds. Projects are funded if the cost of potential losses from a disaster would exceed the cost of the mitigation project.

After the plan is adopted by the Board, the Village could apply for funds to help private property owners. Though grant funds are available for homeowners, the Village must apply for these funds on behalf of residents. One interesting note: For projects done on private property, the property owner is required to put up 75% of the funds and submit for reimbursement.

Grant monies could be used in a number of ways to alleviate flooding. For instance, if the Village wanted to buy a large tract of land to retain water Scarsdale could apply for funding for land acquisition. Grants are eligible to fund the purchase, and even to tear down an existing structure on a property.

These funds are also available for preventative measures such as planning and zoning, open space preservation, land development regulations, building codes, and storm water management. In addition monies are available to protect properties by fitting them with storm shutters, rebuilding barriers, flood-proofing structures and retrofitting buildings to withstand high winds.

Also available for funding are:

  • Measures to educate the public and to build awareness
  • Natural resource protection to prevent erosion and control sediment
  • Protection of streams and wetlands
  • Mitigation funds are available because they will reduce a community’s long term costs for road closures and evacuations, repairs, and road maintenance.

After the plan is implemented, it will need to be updated every five years.

The consultant expected Scarsdale’s plan to be approved by FEMA shortly. He then recommended that the Village begin to file grant applications to win funds for many needed projects.

You can read the mitigation plan in its entirety on the Village website here

It is also important to know that there are funds available for individual homeowners that homeowners can apply for themselves. After Hurricane Irene, FEMA did make funds available to individuals who were damaged by the storm. There is a FEMA disaster center for homeowners at the County Center that is now open 7 days a week. It is recommended that you register before you go by calling 800-621-3362 or going online to: www.disasterassistance.gov

 

 

 

gattatlangesThe Scarsdale Chamber of Commerce and HSBC Bank are sponsoring a picnic for area newcomers at the Scarsdale Women’s Club on Sunday September 25, from 1-4 pm. If you’ve moved in during the last two years, you are invited to meet local merchants, civic and charitable organizations and learn more about your hometown.

There will also be games and prizes for the kids! Come to the Scarsdale Women’s Club at 37 Drake Road Scarsdale on Sunday afternoon.

In other news from the Scarsdale Chamber of Commerce, former Mayor Carolyn Stevens has now joined as Executive Director and in just a few short months she has grown the membership list and done much to add vitality to the group.

On Thursday night September 15, the Chamber met at Lange’s where members enjoyed a delicious chicken and pasta dinner graciously supplied by Tony. Stevens invited Village Manager Al Gatta to brief the group and answer questions.

Gatta relayed that the Popham Road bridge project is moving along and scheduled for completion in about a year. The new bridge will replace the former one which was 100 years old and badly in need of repair. The new stone structure will have five lanes for traffic, 10-foot sidewalks on each side and wrought iron fencing.

Merchants questioned Gatta about downtown parking and expressed concern that strict parking regulations and zealous traffic police were deterring people from doing business downtown. With one-hour meters, patients in the dentist’s office or those at the salon do not have adequate time to complete their appointments without getting a ticket. The group discussed the need for more two and three-hour meters and more parking spaces. Ideally, Gatta believes that the Village could use 250 more spaces.

Last – a new Wine Bar and restaurant is rumored to be opening on Christie Place in the space once occupied by Roundabout. Stay posted for more information!

 

 

1PalmerEntranceLast week Heathcote residents who live near the Five Corners received letters from MD Drilling and Blasting in regard to the construction project now going on at 1 Palmer Avenue . According to the letter, MD has been selected to do the rock drilling and blasting that will be required to build the new 11,000 square foot retail building on the site, which includes two levels of underground parking.

In order to get the permit to conduct the blasts, the company is required to offer home inspections residents who live nearby to document any existing cracks in the foundation or walls. Once this is done, residents will be able to ascertain whether or not the blasts damage their homes. Residents have a choice of whether or not they wish to allow the inspectors inside.

This is the first notification that neighbors received about the upcoming explosions, which the letter says will be conducted during daylight hours. According to the letter a whistle warning sequence will precede the blasts and those nearby could “experience low levels of ground vibration.” The company plans to use "the most advanced technologies available to measure the seismic effect of the area." Given the areas close proximity to the Heathcote Elementary School, the blasts could be a cause for concern. During the approval process for the project, concerned residents closely scrutinized the plans but there was no discussion about the need to use explosives to build the new structure.

According to Scarsdale Building Department Engineer Nunzio Pietrosanti, similar blasting was done when the new building was constructed at Christie Place with little disruption to the area. The survey is just the first step in the process of getting a permit to conduct the blasts.

Update: To respond to questions from readers, we contacted a representative from MD Drilling and Blasting in Bloomfield, CT. They advised any neighbors within 250 feet of the site of the upcoming work.