School Board Members Express Support for Proposed $101mm Bond
- Details
- Written by: Wendy MacMillan
- Hits: 1119
Though the Scarsdale School District is in the thick of budget season, the Board of Education remains equally dedicated to the regular issues of business. At the Board of Education on Monday March, 16th, district leaders provided updates on hiring, transportation, and a bond update, while also hearing from community members who shared their concerns during public comment.
Board Members State Their Support for Proposed Bond
After a brief update on the proposed bond, the Board of Education unanimously voted to adopt the resolution for the Bond Proposition to be presented to qualified voters at the Annual District Meeting and Election on Tuesday, May 19, 2026. See the draft of the bond proposition here.
Before voting, Board members took turns sharing their statements of support.
BOE President James Dugan related, “I just wanted to add my perspective that I believe that this capital bond project is an important milestone for the District. We recognize that this is a significant investment in the future of our District, and we are confident that this investment at this time is the right step to ensure the continued vitality and exceptional experience for which Scarsdale schools are so well-known.
I am thankful for all of the work that has been done here, by community volunteers, School District employees, and our professional advisors. I am proud of what we have done so far, but there is still a lot of work left to do to educate the public and gather support for the bond. I am confident that the Scarsdale community will assess this project with an open mind and in good faith, as they have done so far, and I look forward to a favorable vote in May.”
BOE member Laura Lui shared, “The quality of our physical learning spaces is central to student experiences. As our buildings get older, there are a large amount of much-needed improvements that we must address…I believe the proposed bond scope strikes the right balance between needs and affordability.
The incremental tax impact on households from this proposed bond is made more manageable by the anticipated reduction in debt service. Those previous bonds remind us that this community has continuously supported our schools. And now we need to do the same.
The process that brought us to this proposed bond has been deliberate, transparent, and inclusive. Multiple perspectives were carefully considered, and members of the community as well as many constituent groups spoke not only for their own needs but also for the broader good of the district. In that sense, the bond process itself is an exercise of our school value of non sibi — not only for one self, but also for service to others.”
In her statement Colleen Brown related, “Scarsdale has always taken pride in supporting its students and maintaining a school system that families value. For more than 200 years, our community has understood that investing in education is an investment in our future.
As a board member, I recognize that asking residents to support a $101 million bond is significant. However, it is also necessary. Our buildings are aging, many systems are reaching the end of their useful life, and several spaces no longer meet the needs of today’s students. Addressing issues such as outdated HVAC systems, overcrowded school buildings, and aging learning spaces is essential to maintaining the high standard of education Scarsdale is known for.
Our schools are one of the primary reasons families choose to move to Scarsdale, and they remain central to the strength of our community and our property values. This bond allows us to modernize our facilities, better support our students, and ensure that future generations continue to benefit from the exceptional education our district provides.
For these reasons, I strongly support this bond and believe it represents an important investment in both our students and the long-term vitality of the Scarsdale community.”
Adding his perspective as a resident who no longer has children in the school system, Bob Klein shared, “As both a School Board member and Scarsdale community resident that is an empty nester, I have viewed the proposed bond through both lenses and want to confirm that I believe the proposed bond represents an appropriate balance between my fiscal responsibility and my commitment to support the school district in providing an education for all students that is inclusive and demonstrates vision for what our youth will require to enter the adult world with the skills to be successful in whatever avenue the pursue. This balance was not easy or simple to achieve but I am confident it acknowledges the community's priorities as well as being consistent with the strategic plan the district has embarked on.”
In her thoughtful statement, Suzie Hahn echoed many of the aforementioned sentiments and added, “The scope of work upholds strongly held values in Scarsdale as articulated in our Strategic Plan of Learning, Living, and Leading - allowing us to preserve class sizes at the elementary level, for example, as well as further developing student centered community spaces throughout our schools. This bond responds to the fact that the way we teach and learn has evolved, and will continue to evolve to meet the changing needs of our students.”
Amber Yusef’s comment also voiced her support for the proposed bond in which she stated, “Comments we received show a thoughtful community focused on fiscal discipline, prioritization, and fairness. Residents asked for clarity around costs, careful project scoping, and reassurance that investments address core needs such as safety, infrastructure, and long-term reliability. These are expectations of good stewardship, not objections to progress.
This bond reflects those values. It prioritizes essential building systems, health and safety improvements, and facilities that support high-quality education today while preparing for the future. Choices were made, some needs deferred, and discipline is evident in the plan.”
Leah Dembitzer shared her passionate support of the proposed bond by saying, “The schools are the crown jewel of our community; they are central to Scarsdale’s identity. They unite us, enhancing our lives in so many ways. We must invest in our schools over time and this is one such moment as there is need and significant debt is rolling off in 2027-28.
Buildings that were built 100 years ago – such as Fox Meadow, Edgewood and even Scarsdale High School – were not set-up and designed for teaching and learning as is currently taking place in public education.
I strongly believe that the proposed improvements, which will touch all seven of our schools, will make an incredible impact on teaching and learning, and the education and development of the whole child.
I’d like to comment specifically on how I view the Scarsdale Schools’ approach to educating and enriching the whole child. The “whole child” is not just a phrase used in an empty way; it is a very real effort and experience cultivated within our school community. Educating the whole child is more than just offering a required math class; rather, it’s inspiring and nurturing the passions and interests of our students. The realization of this concept empowers our students by giving them the tools and support needed to develop the myriad facets of their character, bringing them joy, learning and edification in ways beyond rote memorization and studying for a test. I strongly believe in this concept and I believe that the crux of this bond is about furthering this essential school community value.
This bond focuses on enhancing the spatial experience of several of our buildings; creating classrooms, libraries, multi-use spaces that are current, engaging and collaborative. It focuses on repairing and rejuvenating the fields where our students play and learn, where they become good teammates, where they learn to win or lose and to be stronger physically and mentally. This bond will provide dignified spaces for nuanced support services now essential to public education and student well-being. This bond will touch several of our libraries – at Fox Meadow, Heathcote, Scarsdale Middle School and Scarsdale High School - improving and renovating hubs of student learning and collaborative work. Further, this bond adds air conditioning to our largest spaces, which will allow our students to use and enjoy a space throughout the school year and summer; fostering and furthering the development of the whole child in a healthier, safer, cooled space.
The process of building this bond made me realize, internalize that we are creating, visioning, not just for this moment but for the future of our community. I take that responsibility very seriously; preserving the schools not only for our current students but protecting and enhancing our spaces and grounds for future generations, for the future children of Scarsdale. I appreciate the work of the district, my fellow board members, and especially the engagement of our incredible community. We are Scarsdale - we are leaders in public education. I am proud to vote yes on the bond resolution to preserve our schools, not just for us but for the future, non sibi.”
Other Board Meeting Highlights
Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources, Meghan Troy, reported several open teaching positions due to retirements, along with assistant principal vacancies at the middle school and Heathcote Elementary. Recruitment efforts are ongoing, with postings active and candidates applying following outreach at job fairs. Interviews are expected in the coming weeks, with hiring committees, including educators, administrators, and trained stakeholders, playing a central role. Final candidates will be presented to the Board later this spring.
In his Cabinet Update, Assistant Superintendent of Business, Andrew Lennon announced the arrival of its first electric school bus, which he described as “very quiet” and significantly different from traditional diesel models. The bus is expected to begin service soon after registration and driver training, supported by new charging infrastructure, as part of a broader push toward sustainability and in response to state requirements.
Additionally, the Board approved contracts for a new high school turf practice field, with construction expected to be completed before graduation.
Public Comment
During public comment, Erika Rublin, current SHS PTA President, urged the district to reconsider deferring a full-time math teaching position.
“While we understand the fiscal pressures,” Rublin said, “we respectfully request that the district reconsider the deferral… We’re concerned about its impact on the student experience.”
Rublin, speaking on behalf of the SHS PTA Executive Committee, noted that class sizes already exceed 25 students in multiple math sections and 28 in physics, arguing that continued staffing constraints could undermine both instructional quality and flexibility for students.
“Sufficient staffing is required to maintain this flexibility,” she added, referencing the school’s ability to adjust student placement midyear. “We believe we are now at an inflection point where staying under the tax cap may have a direct impact on our students’ experience.”
Residents Voice Strong Opposition to Artificial Turf
Multiple residents spoke at length about concerns surrounding artificial turf, with several urging the district to reconsider or pause planned installations.
One speaker, a practicing physician, described synthetic fields as “costly and an environmental nightmare, toxic for humans and devastating for our environment,” arguing that natural grass fields could be re-engineered to meet playability needs. She cited growing concern over PFAS chemicals and referenced warnings from Mount Sinai Health System and other health organizations.
“There’s no safe level,” she said of certain chemicals, adding, “what you’re putting on our fields… is affecting everyone. It’s not just your six-year-old—it’s our Earth.”
In addition to environmental and health concerns, another resident pointed to concerns about long-term costs and drainage issues, arguing that synthetic fields require expensive replacement cycles and may not perform as intended during heavy weather events.
A third speaker echoed environmental concerns while highlighting community sentiment. “I’m very concerned about the use of inorganic material… for surfaces our children are going to play on,” he said, adding that many families moving into the area increasingly prioritize sustainability and health considerations.
In his Response to Public Comment, Dr. Drew Patrick acknowledged the range of perspectives and clarified that Butler Field remains the only synthetic field currently in use. Any future turf decisions, particularly those tied to long-term capital planning, would come before the Board at a later stage.
Patrick also emphasized that the district continues to balance competing priorities, including educational quality, fiscal constraints, and environmental responsibility, as it moves forward with planning for the upcoming school year.
To watch the meeting in its entirety see here.
Pool Project is a Go!
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 2055
The Village Board took the next step toward construction of the new pool complex with an indoor/outdoor natatorium, three outdoor pools, locker rooms and more at their meeting on Tuesday March 10,2026.
SQRA Review of Pool Project
A full SQRA review of the project was conducted to consider all potential environmental impacts, including soils, migratory birds, eagles, bats, butterflies, endangered species and even the potential effects to the neighboring Boulder Brook Stables.
The resolution defines the full scope of the project, including the “redevelopment of the Project by demolishing an existing seasonal bathhouse, pool filtration building and other site elements to accommodate new structures, including a 20,297 square foot natatorium building, a 12,639 square foot year-round bathhouse to support the natatorium, a 10,300 square foot outdoor diving pool, a 3,700 square foot leisure pool, an outdoor children’s area with two pools (3,700 square feet and 1,600 square feet) and a 1,600 square foot splash pad, a 5,554 square foot seasonal bathhouse to support the outdoor pools and summer camp, a new playground and sport court area, and a seasonal mechanical building for outdoor pool filtration equipment.”
The study found that the project would have no negative environmental impacts, and as lead agency, the Village Board adopted a Negative Declaration
Bonds
The Board then authorized resolutions for a series of bond to underwrite the project including
-$48,033,634 for the natatorium
-$10,655,007 for ancillary buildings including the seasonal bathhouse, concession stands, mechanical building and utility building
-$5,672,808 for the cost of the construction of various outdoor pools as part of the municipal pool complex, including a leisure pool, children’s pool and wading pool.
-$9,638,551 for construction of a playground, volleyball court, multisport court and spray pad, landscaping improvements.
Audit
Prior to the Village Board meeting, auditors from PKF O’Connor Davies reported on their audit of Village finances and gave Scarsdale a stellar review.
Their report found that “The Village remains in a strong financial position with sound governance, effective controls and prudent fiscal management.”
Auditors reported, “We have found no material weaknesses or deficiencies and no fraud or illegal acts during the audit” … and “the Village has demonstrated “continued strong financial oversight and internal controls and that the Village has been awarded a Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting, which should be a positive signal to residents, bondholders and rating agencies."
Scarsdale’s Revolutionary Transition: Historical Society Presentation Set for March 16
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 832
Wayside Cottage in the snow, undated. The cottage is one of Scarsdale's oldest existing landmarks dating back to c. 1715. Photo Credit: Scarsdale Public LibraryThe Scarsdale Historical Society will host an upcoming program exploring Scarsdale’s transformation before and after the American Revolution, presented by Scarsdale Village Historian and Scarsdale Historical Society Vice President, Jordan Copeland. This event is part of a yearlong celebration commemorating 250 years of American history and 325 years of Scarsdale. The presentation is at 6:45 PM at Scarsdale Public Library’s Scott Room, and registered attendees can also join virtually.
The talk explores Scarsdale's transformation from a colonial manor to an American town after the Revolution, explaining how the manor system functioned particular to Scarsdale, how the American Revolution ravaged Scarsdale, and what changed under town government after the Revolution. Drawing on surviving 18th-century records, the presentation examines daily life in early Scarsdale and how residents helped shape a new community.
“We’re delighted to kick off Scarsdale’s 325th and America’s 250th anniversary celebrations with a presentation that explores Scarsdale’s early American transformation," said Randy Guggenheimer, President of the Scarsdale Historical Society. “There's no better time to examine how early decisions shaped political, social, and civic life today.”
Presentation: Scarsdale’s Revolutionary Transition: From Colonial Manor to American Town
Date Monday, March 16, 2026
Location: Scarsdale Public Library (Scott Room) or Virtual
Time: 6:45 Presentation *Everyone is invited to attend the Annual Meeting at 6:30 PM before the presentation.
Admission: Free and open to the public
RSVP: bit.ly/March-16-rev

About the Scarsdale Historical Society
The Scarsdale Historical Society exists to discover, preserve and disseminate historical information, as well as inspire others to learn about and contribute to the history of Scarsdale and the Central Mid-Westchester Region. The Scarsdale Historical Society accepts grant applications for projects that meet its mission, particularly those that will inspire others to learn about the history of Scarsdale and the surrounding communities. Learn more at www.scarsdalehistoricalsociety.org
Unitarian Society Opens in Hartsdale
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1234
Hartsdale has a new house of worship.
Looking for a welcoming and inclusive faith community where you can pursue your own spiritual journey?
The First Unitarian Society of Westchester, formerly of Hastings-on-Hudson, has relocated to 210 North Central Avenue, Suite 130 in Hartsdale. Founded in Yonkers in the mid-19th century, it is a vibrant congregation composed of individuals of many beliefs and backgrounds. FUSW is a liberal and welcoming religious community that is inclusive and encourages connection, community, spiritual growth, and activism on behalf of social justice. Unitarians explore many spiritual paths and believe that truth is revealed from many sources including personal experience, science, the Judeo-Christian tradition, teachings of other world religions, humanist thought, reason and conscience. The congregation celebrates diversity of belief and experience and welcomes people of every race, color, age, ability, religious background, sexual orientation or identity or expression.
Visit their new location, a beautifully designed wheelchair accessible worship space, and stay for a friendly coffee hour held after each service. Sunday services are at 10:30 am in-person and online, via Zoom. Services are led by Reverend Arlin Roy, by guest speakers or by members of the congregation. You may find their other activities of interest too: Men’s and Women’s discussion and support groups (open to all gender identities), Reading Black Lives Matter book clubs, a meditation circle, a writing group, the choir, social action programs including support of the Midnight Run and soup kitchens, adult religious exploration workshops, weekly children’s classes, and more. Learn more about FUSW at www.fusw.org or call 914-478-2710.
Residents Speak Out on Reveal Math and the School Budget at Board Meeting
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 2597
There were more people than usual in attendance than usual at the 2/9 meeting of the Scarsdale Board of Education, and during the public comments portion it became clear that some in the group had a specific agenda.
Comments on Reveal Math
Nine speakers, including a first grader came to the mic and more called in to express their concerns about the current math curriculum, Reveal Math. They highlighted issues such as excessive reading and writing assignments, fragmented concept introductions, and overly complicated calculations. Many of the parents noted that their children find the curriculum confusing and inefficient, leading to a need for outside tutoring. A petition urged a reevaluation of the curriculum. Parents stressed the importance of a clear, foundational math program to support future STEM education. They requested a formal review and consideration of a more proven alternative like Singapore Math.
Here are excerpts from their comments:
“My second grader, for example, consistently complains about Reveal math, not because the math is advanced, but because the curriculum places excessive emphasis on reading and writing assignments often requiring lengthy reading explanations and the story based response, instead of focusing on fundamental math skills, logical reasoning and step by step problem solving…. there are straightforward calculations that are often over complicated with unclear and sometimes very random and arbitrary steps.”
“We are already hearing that outside tutoring is becoming necessary just to keep up, and my husband is trying to teach my daughter at home to supplement the school curriculum. A district curriculum should not require private supplementation to be effective. We are not opposed to change, and we support strong conceptual instruction, but we urge the board to critically evaluate whether this curriculum best serves elementary students, to closely monitor outcomes and confidence and to remain open to revisiting or supplementing this decision if gaps in fluency emerge.”
“I would like to share my experience with my son's example. I talked to him today regarding a simple question, three plus eight. He said he learned three different methods to calculate three plus eight. And one of the methods he has been asked to use is called adjustment .. adjusting eight to 10, then also adjusting the three. So he got really confused a lot of times. Now he's telling me eight plus three, I have to adjust eight to ten, and also add two to the three. So eight plus two plus three plus two, equal to 15. But he said it doesn't make sense, because eight plus three, I know is 11, but with the new methodology introduced, he has been very confused.”
“It has been just heartbreaking to hear all the frustration from my kids, especially for my fourth grader, my daughter, who is a very strong reader. She loves reading books. But with Reveal Math, there are two problems. One is the questions are too long and confusing and she mentioned that no one in her class understand what the question means, so the teacher literally has to explain to them in simple languages, what is the problem we are solving for.”
The group later forwarded a petition to Scarsdale10583. Here is the introduction:
To the Scarsdale School Board and Curriculum Committee,
We, the undersigned parents and community members of Scarsdale, are writing to formally and urgently request that the district immediately reevaluate the use of the Reveal Math curriculum in our elementary schools and initiate a prompt process to identify and transition to a more effective, research-validated alternative. Our group includes 34 parents representing a broader petition signed by 240 Scarsdale residents to date, spanning all elementary schools and grade levels Of these 34 parents, 56% have STEM educational backgrounds, including several with PhDs in mathematics and related disciplines. This collective expertise underscores the seriousness and technical grounding of our concerns, some highlighted comments below: Contact them here: scarsdalemathinfo@gmail.com
Superintendent Drew Patrick and Assistant Superintendent Edgar McIntosh took the opportunity to respond to the comments and emphasized that while concerns are being heard, decisions will continue to follow a deliberate, research-based process.
The administrators thanked parents and students who spoke at the meeting and submitted letters, acknowledging shared goals around student achievement and long-term success. Patrick conveyed that he understands the concerns, including comments from families who feel their children’s enthusiasm for math has declined, and stressed that fostering both strong skills and a love of learning remains a priority.
At the same time, he said that curriculum decisions are not made by petition or volume of feedback alone. He described the process as collaborative and structured, involving teachers, building leaders and administrators, with the board acting on recommendations rather than independently determining curriculum. He also noted that the district has a contractual obligation to work with educators on instructional decisions and that any changes are rooted in student learning data, research and classroom experience.
While Patrick said an immediate reversal of curriculum changes is not feasible, he emphasized that the district continuously monitors student outcomes and makes adjustments as needed. He went on to underscore that the board conducts its deliberations publicly and that day-to-day curriculum work is led by instructional staff.
To increase transparency, the district will host a “Curriculum Coffee” on February 26th focused on how teachers build automaticity and flexibility in math instruction across grade levels. The session will include classroom demonstrations and examples of how core materials are supplemented. In addition, administrators plan to schedule a separate virtual forum to walk families through how curricular decisions are made, the research behind recent updates, and the assessments used to ensure students maintain foundational skills.
The administrators made clear that they remain committed to ongoing engagement and to ensuring instructional practices both strengthen achievement and sustain students’ interest in learning.
Comments on the Budget
At the meeting on 2/9, Mayra Kirkendall Rodriguez made the following comments:
I am Mayra Kirkendall-Rodríguez, and along with Rachana Sing, we are the PTC Budget Study Chairs. We would like to remind the Board of Ed and the Scarsdale community that it is customary in Scarsdale for PTC Budget Chairs to send in questions to the District and BOE during the budget process. We are also soliciting questions from the seven Budget Liaisons at our schools.
We will be emailing questions this evening which are about budget growth, pressures on health reserves and fund balance, the projected operating deficit, if the District plans to keep with the tax cap, and the important interconnections of the proposed series of debt issuance, the proposed budget and the long range plan.
For example, here are a few of the questions we have:
-Since the staffing requests presentation notes that each 1% budget increase equals roughly $1.92 million, would you please share the current projected percentage increase and what guardrails you are using to keep spending sustainable?
-Staffing requests add approximately 4.3 FTE overall — would you please share the multi-year financial impact, including salary, benefits, and pension costs?
-What data demonstrates that expanding elementary social work services is the most effective approach to student support?
-The staffing presentation noted an estimated $286K decrease in state aid; can that loss be absorbed without increasing the tax burden?
-Given the volatility of the self-funded health plan, what contingency plans are in place if healthcare costs exceed projections?
-Pension costs are projected to change; how do those shifts affect long-term financial planning beyond this single budget cycle?
-What are the biggest financial risks you see over the next three to five years, and how is this budget preparing for them?
-Would it be possible for the District to create a tax calculator to help residents understand the impact of the proposed budget on their household? Of course, thanks to Mr. Lennon and his team for creating the tax calculator to assess the impact of the $101.7mm series of debt issuances, often referred to as ‘the bond.’
The list of questions about the budget sent to the District may be found here.
Speaking at the 2/2/26 Board of Education meeting, Rochana Sing said:
"I want to clarify a point made by the District’s Assistant Superintendent of Business , Mr. Lennon, during the discussion of this bond on February 2nd.
Mr. Lennon stated and I quote “the presumption all throughout our process is that this bond will be a tax impact to our community”and that “the funding source will be property taxes.” He also explained that while the bond’s debt service is exempt from the tax cap, the district would increase the tax levy to cover those costs.
I want to be very clear for the community about what that means.
Tax-cap exemption does not mean taxes will not rise. It means the district has the authority to raise the tax levy above the cap in order to pay the bond’s principal and interest.
Mr. Lennon also said and I quote “this bond would not impact the deficits or the long-range fund balance projections.” That conclusion depends entirely on the assumption that property taxes are increased sufficiently every year to cover the local share of the bond after netting for State Building Aid.
In other words, after Building Aid is applied, the remaining local share becomes a recurring expenditure, and as Mr. Lennon acknowledged, that cost is funded through higher property taxes. The bond may not create a paper deficit if taxes are raised accordingly, but it does result in a higher tax burden for residents year after year and this will be in addition to the tax impact estimator
For this reason, statements about tax-cap exemption should not be interpreted to mean there is no tax impact. As Mr. Lennon himself stated, this bond does have a tax impact, and that impact should be fully reflected in long-term financial planning before the scope of the bond is approved.
Cap - exempt does not mean consequence exempt
The question is has the BOE done due diligence to find out the compounding effect of this capital bond on our annual taxes.The Board should ask for the compounding impact on the annual tax bill over the life of the bond.”
- Foley, Schulhof, and Silberfein File Nominating Petitions for Scarsdale Village Trustee
- Crime Stats, Fire Report and More from Village Hall
- Planning Board Declares Themselves Lead Agency for a SEQR Review of Proposed Development at 80, 88, and 90 Garden Road
- Questions About the Largest School Bond Proposal in Scarsdale’s History, or What Are We Getting for $98 Million?
