Paulin Reviews a Bipartisan Effort to Secure the Release of Yeonsoo Go
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1870
How did Assemblywoman Amy Paulin work to secure the release of Yeonsoo Go, a 2024 Scarsdale High School graduate who was detained by ICE? Paulin was interviewed about her work by News 12 reporter Jonathan Gordon on August 11, 2025 and here is what she said:
Jonathan Gordon: Turning to a story that sparked outrage which stretched far beyond one small Westchester village, Yeonsoo Go, a Scarsdale High School graduate and student at Purdue University, was released from ICE custody after she was arrested moments after a hearing to extend her visa. The saga brought out support for her and her family as a bipartisan group of lawmakers pushed to secure - and eventually did secure - her release. Among them was State Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, whose district includes Scarsdale. Assemblywoman Paulin joins us to talk more about the situation and the broader issue of immigration enforcement in our communities. Assemblywoman, thank you so much for being here. Can you talk to us about what happened?
Assemblywoman Amy Paulin: Yeonsoo went to immigration court for what she believed was a routine court appearance to extend her visa beyond December 2025, as it was valid through that time, and to address her green card application which she had applied for in July. On Thursday, July 31, after the court appearance, she was essentially arrested and detained at 26 Federal Plaza. Then on Saturday morning, we now know from her, she was taken to the airport by bus at about 10:15 a.m. and flown to Louisiana. Yesterday, (Monday, August 4), she returned to New York and then was released around 6:00 p.m. when her mother got there.
Jonathan Gordon: Let’s pull back the curtain a little bit. Behind the scenes you were working with federal partners on both sides of the aisle to get her home, maybe not part of the traditional legislative job. What can you tell us about what was actually going on there?
Assemblywoman Amy Paulin: Well, there’s nothing that isn’t part of my job, just so you know. The mother of one of Yeonsoo’s dear friends who knew two of my staff members very well (they live in the same neighborhood) had reached out to them and they in turn reached out to me to see what we could do. I immediately contacted Chuck Schumer’s office, Kristin Gillibrand’s office, George Latimer’s office, and Mike Lawler’s office. When I knew she was Korean, I reached out to Grace Meng’s office. That was between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Saturday morning. Chuck Schumer’s office had already been contacted by her church. George Latimer’s office had already been contacted by the family, just like I was, but the others had not been.
They then coordinated together, Democrats working together under Chuck Schumer’s leadership and Mike Lawler on the Republican side, to contact the agencies involved to try to free her and to explain that her visa was intact and to find out exactly what was happening. Mike Lawler, being in the majority, of course had best access to the information and was able to infiltrate, figure out, and ultimately work with DHS most directly.
Clearly on the democratic side, the energy was palpable. There was a lot of collaborative work being done to free Yeonsoo and luckily we had someone on the majority side who was equally a part of it.
I also reached out to another community member who I know is good friends with the president. It’s not a call I could make but it’s a contact they have and a call they could make to the executive branch. Things all started coming together. Sometimes in politics and in all issues if there’s a collective voice it’s paid more attention to. We worked very hard and are very proud that the community came together in this very bipartisan, collective way to address what we believe was an injustice and an unfairness in this case.
Jonathan Gordon: Looking at the bigger picture about immigration enforcement overall, what does this say about the current situation of how the federal government is handling this?
Assemblywoman Amy Paulin: Well, it’s clear to me something changed. Yeonsoo’s mom is a pastor and went from one responsibility to another within the same church, so essentially she changed jobs. That was the excuse given for the change in visa. That job change however was two years ago, and there had been several court appearances since that time, yet Yeonsoo and her mom were never detained until now.
Now if there’s any discrepancy or even if it’s an inadvertent mistake that is easily rectified, there’s an immediate jump to detainment. That’s a shift and a change – and one that is very unfair because not everyone is going to have a close-knit community who is going to rally around one person, or who will have important contacts and funders connected to very high up sources. We were very lucky in that way in this case. There are, as you say, many cases out there where people are not going have those resources to prevent deportation.
Jonathan Gordon: Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, thank you so much for joining the show.
Scarsdale Leads the Way with First Electric Sanitation Truck in Westchester
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1522
Scarsdale has officially put the first electric truck in all of Westchester County on the road—and it’s thanks to the efforts of the Scarsdale Conservation Advisory Council (CAC), the Department of Public Works, and the Village Board. Pictured are some of the key people who made it happen: CAC Chair Michelle Sterling, CAC Member Ron Schulhof, former CAC member and now Trustee Jason Kofman, Mayor Justin Arest, Superintendent of Public Works Jeff Coleman, Assistant Superintendent of Public Works Tyler Seifert, and Trustee Jeremy Wise. This is a proud moment for a community that truly prioritizes sustainability and environmental progress, and makes it happen!
(Photo Credit: Jonathan Mark)
The old truck was decomissioned.
Latimer Demands Answers About the Closure of the Bronxville Post Office
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 1977
On July 22, 2025 U.S. Representative George Latimer (NY-16) sent a letter to Postmaster General David Steiner about the closure of the Bronxville Post Office and reports of unsafe working conditions for employees. The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) closed the Bronxville Post Office on July 17th and have been unable to commit to a re-opening date.
In the letter Congressman Latimer said, “Some of my constituents have been unable to receive important parcels, including medications, posing an immediate and unacceptable risk to their health. When my constituents inquired about this issue, they received a response that the Bronxville Post Office is closed and that the timeline for reopening is unknown… Furthermore, my office has received constituent reports about the possible presence of mold and maintenance issues with the boiler at the Bronxville Post Office. USPS has an obligation to ensure that it provides employees with a safe and healthy work environment as well as prompt, reliable, and efficient services for patrons.”
Congressman Latimer requested USPS respond to him about a re-opening date and efforts to make the office safer for workers and patrons by August 5th.
Here is the full text of the letter:
Postmaster General Steiner:
I write to you with serious concerns regarding the closure of the Bronxville Post Office, as well
as several other issues pertaining to poor conditions that have been reported at this location. I
respectfully request that you provide answers to the questions below and urge you to take
immediate action to remedy these issues that are affecting my constituents.
My office first received reports from constituents on July 17, 2025 that the Bronxville Post Office was closed with no explanation to residents or the Village of Bronxville. As a result, some of my constituents have been unable to receive important parcels, including medications, posing an immediate and unacceptable risk to their health. When my constituents inquired about this issue, they received a response that the Bronxville Post Office is closed and that the timeline for reopening is unknown.
I have also received reports regarding poor conditions at this location, posing risks to both USPS staff and patrons. At present, USPS staff and patrons must rely on two small portable fans to cool the front office and lobby areas. This temporary solution is inadequate during the hot summer months, when indoor temperatures rise to uncomfortable and potentially dangerous levels. The current conditions not only compromise employee well-being but also create an unpleasant environment for the many residents who rely on postal services daily.
Additionally, one of the exterior light fixtures at the main entrance has been non-functional for over a year. As a result, the steps and entryway remain poorly lit during the late afternoon and evening hours, posing a safety concern. The only working fixture remains continuously on, suggesting there may be a broader malfunction in the lighting system.
Furthermore, my office has received constituent reports about the possible presence of mold and maintenance issues with the boiler at the Bronxville Post Office. USPS has an obligation to ensure that it provides employees with a safe and healthy work environment as well as prompt, reliable, and efficient services for patrons.
Given the concerns shared above, I request answers to the following questions:
1. What is the reason for the closure of the Bronxville Post Office?
2. Is mail delivery for patrons of the Bronxville Post Office still being conducted?
3. How can residents and business owners access their post office boxes?
4. Will another local post office receive and distribute mail on behalf of the Bronxville Post Office during its closure?
5. Some reports have indicated that mail to Post Office Boxes in the Bronxville location was redirected to the Yonkers Main Post Office. Can you confirm this report, and if so, explain how and when customers were made aware?
6. When will the Bronxville Post Office reopen?
7. What is being done to ensure that the temperature at the Bronxville Post Office is not resulting in uncomfortable and potentially hazardous conditions for USPS staff and patrons?
8. What is being done to ensure that the exterior light fixtures at the main entrance of the Bronxville Post Office are not posing a safety risk to USPS staff and patrons?
9. Has mold been detected at the Bronxville Post office?
10. When was the last time that the vents at the Bronxville Post Office were thoroughly cleaned to prevent mold and how regularly is this done?
11. If there is mold present at the Bronxville Post Office, what actions are you taking to remediate this?
I look forward to receiving a response in a timely manner and will follow up no later than August 5, 2025 if I have not received a response at that time.
Thank you for your attention to these issues.
Sincerely,
George Latimer
Member of Congress
New York 16th Congressional District
We Won’t Be Flocked Again: Mayor Postpones Surveillance Plans
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 3101
(This is the opinion of site founder Joanne Wallenstein) On the same day as three disappointing Supreme Court decisions came down, imperiling the right to abortion, birthright citizenship and public education, there was some good news for defenders of democracy in Scarsdale.
In a surprising late afternoon email on Friday June 27, Mayor Justin Arest announced that he had “postponed” highly controversial plans to install license plate readers, cameras and a drone, all connected to a network supplied by Flock Safety.
A contract, which was signed with Flock Safety in April, had drawn ire from many residents. Without public notice or discussion, the Village committed to a 7-year $1.8mm contract that would have imposed a surveillance system on residents, their cars, their homes and the streets of Scarsdale.
A petition opposing the plan was signed by over 400 Scarsdalians and there were numerous meetings after the deal was done, where residents warned about the potential uses and misuses of the data gathered by the system. Rather than offering an extra layer of protection, many felt that we would become the unwilling source of data for government agencies and private companies who would use it for unintended consequences.
In response to these cries, the Mayor, Board of Trustees, Police Chief and Village Attorney sought to offer guarantees that the data would be secure and the tracking was legal. But savvy residents with expertise in technology, cybersecurity and the law pointed to a wealth of evidence to demonstrate why Scarsdale should avoid an arrangement with a surveillance firm who has a track record of releasing private data. Others questioned whether tracking residents without a search warrant was legal and suggested that the Village was wading into dangerous waters.
The matter was further complicated by the lack of a transparent process to identify why increased security was called for, to assess gaps in the current system, to research options, to interview a range of vendors and allow resident input. From what we can see, Flock was selected by the Police Chief without an RFP using a “sole sourcing” provision, which claims that they were the only firm that could supply what was needed. The entire decision rested on a claim of rising crime rates, which were unsubstantiated by the numbers from 2024-25.
Now that the Board has put this on pause, let’s hope we all learn from our mistakes.
If the police still believe that more security is needed, let’s reboot the process.
During the past few months many resident experts have come forth who would be a great asset to future decision-making. As a first step, name a committee of these expert residents, the Police Chief, a Village Trustee, a Village Manager and the Village’s IT chief to analyze the issue.
Charge them with assessing what is needed, who can provide it and requesting proposals. Do the necessary due diligence on any potential vendors. Keep in mind that Scarsdale is a small Village that values its privacy and does not need to be networked to a national database.
Bring options to the Village for open discussion and debate before making another flawed decision. If we follow the process, we won’t get flocked again.
Commenting on the postponement, Mayra Kirkendall Rodriguez, who championed the petition against Flock, said, “I hope that all of us learn valuable lessons from the Flock Safety debacle. The Mayor and Village Board should abide by New York's Sunshine laws and be transparent with our community. We, the residents, should be very attentive to what goes on at Village Hall. Even if you are the trusting type, now be the verifying type.”
Responding to Beth Rosen's comment below, Michelle Sterling said, "It's time for "Beth Rosen" to come out from behind the curtain. If you have something to say about our community, you should have the integrity to say it under your real name — not behind a fake persona. Constructive criticism has its place, but hiding behind anonymity only fuels division and encourages hostility rather than dialogue.
What’s even more troubling is the choice to use a Jewish-sounding name while remaining anonymous. As someone who is Jewish and deeply aware of the dangers of antisemitism, I find it offensive and unsettling. This isn’t the first time an anonymous account has used a similar approach, and the pattern is disturbing.
We should all be striving for a more respectful and transparent discourse — one rooted in honesty, accountability, and basic human decency. If you're truly invested in improving our community, then stand behind your words. Otherwise, please stop with the deception.
Privacy vs. Policing: Scarsdale Surveillance Contract With Flock Reflects National Debate
- Details
- Written by: Joanne Wallenstein
- Hits: 3419
(Written by Scarsdale10583 Publisher Joanne Wallenstein)
“Don’t conflate this discussion with national issues.” That’s a line we’ve heard Scarsdale Mayor Justin Arest say a few times in defense of a controversial decision made by the Village Trustees to sign a contract with Flock Safety, a nationwide company that links local police departments with a national data security network.
Arest makes this statement at a time when mass surveillance systems like Flock’s are being used to target immigrants and citizens, sweeping up people without due process. The Mayor continually asserts that despite evidence to the contrary, Scarsdale’s data would be secure and it would not be shared with outside entities.
But as anyone with a bank account or a credit card knows, data is no longer secure.
And as anyone who reads the news is aware, our democracy is under attack. Lawmakers and judges are being threatened, assaulted and killed, free speech is no longer assured and there seem to be no limits to the power of law enforcement officers to terrorize the public.
How does all of this affect Scarsdale?
The Village is home to many from abroad, some permanent residents and others here on temporary visas. Residents employ housekeepers, gardeners, drivers, handymen and workers – some here legally and others without status. Increased surveillance can only help law enforcement target these people who are an integral part of our community. At a recent public hearing, many residents who hail from India and China, spoke with courage about the fear that surveillance instills.
Others simply don’t like the idea of being watched and tracked. They object to living in a police or surveillance state. The Village has imposed this system upon Scarsdale, without giving residents a choice.
Many are deeply concerned about our loss of personal liberties and threats to democracy. They are writing letters, demonstrating, and contributing to fight for their rights. The last thing they want is to have Scarsdale cooperate with a national network that is being used to target the population, an initiative that is being funded by the federal government, subject to the approval of a grant filed by Scarsdale Village.
To me it’s surprising that after the public outcry the Scarsdale Village Board and Police Department did not back down. Instead, they have dug in their heels, claiming that we need the system to fight crime, though the weekly police blotter is dominated by reports of washed checks, lost dogs and illegal signage. See the data on Scarsdale crime below. The Mayor says the adoption process for the contract was transparent and even blames their lack of communication on the loss of the Scarsdale Inquirer. Somehow the Village had time in March to solicit the support for the initiative from senators, assemblymen, clergy, and the school district but never found the opportunity to inform the public.
The data shows that Flock is a solution in search of a problem.
But now the reasons for the when, why, and how this poor decision was made seem beside the point. The Board failed to assess public attitudes before signing the contract and are turning a deaf ear to constituents’ reactions after the deal was done.
The fact is that a seven-year, $1.8mm contract has been signed and the Village is moving forward with the purchase of cameras, license plate readers and drones, training for officers and the hardware and software to support the system.
At a recent meeting, a resident called for the Village to hold this decision to a public referendum but the Village Attorney said this was not within Village code. So there will be no vote.
The only means to change this seems to be a public campaign to demand that the Mayor immediately cancel the contract with Flock. As each day goes by, we have fewer options available to halt the erosion of our democracy. This is one thing you can do on a local level to protect our Village. Despite the Mayor’s claim, the Flock contract here has everything to do with the national scenario.
To voice your opinion, email the Mayor at Mayor@Scarsdale.gov and the Board of Trustees at PublicComments@Scarsdale.gov and tell them to “Stop Flock.”
Commenting on the contract, Myra Saul said, "Thank you for the comprehensive editorial regarding the new surveillance system in Scarsdale. The system is not in anyone’s interest at this time. What is most distressing is the insistence of our elected officials that there is nothing to see here. Every single iota of any consequence is usually discussed in minute detail (sometimes inordinately so) in our community. Why not here? Why the rush? Truly disappointing."
Nancy Alderman said, "No matter what one’s politics are, it has to be acknowledged that the way the United States is now being governed is very different than ever before. The President has been ruling by decree. This was not the way the founders of our country had planned for us. Now we see the same behavior being used by our local officials ruling our village.
We have always felt we had a voice in local school and government here. Until now.
Add to this mess, tension and fear of immigrants and the lack of security for data protection.
The mayor and board acted too quickly. Why? Please explain.
Justice Louis Brandeis said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”
We depend on fact finding journalists to give the information.
Yes, The Scarsdale Inquirer is no more. Neither do subway tokens exist. There are new ways to pay the fare and still ride the subway. There are new ways to get the news. Thank you, Joanne Wallenstein for keeping us informed.
Mr. Mayor, don’t blame the lack of a print newspaper. Find a way to keep the citizens of Scarsdale informed. Why are you afraid of transparency?
The idea of our village government sneaking in secret surveillance equipment is doubly dirty and offensive."
Miriam Popp wrote, "Thank you for informing us of this significant and frightening issue.
Maybe it is time to start electing mayors and trustees who will better reflect the will of the community.
Contrast the apparent reluctance to obtain a full community vetting of this matter with the numerous emails we are all getting to comment on youth sports. If this can be done for youth sports, surely it can be done on surveillance. In fact, it seems like Scarsdale debates ever minute issue ad nauseam and for months and years. One has to wonder why this is being pushed through at lightening speed."
